Parker and dumber news
By Rachel Manteuffel
Kathleen Parker’s column today traces the way the news and its audience have increasingly dumbed down for one another until we’re all dumber and have more dumb things to say but less time to say them. She proposes a solution: teaching news literacy in schools. If students are forced to evaluate the dumbness of their news sources, they will seek out less dumb news sources and thus become themselves less dumb, and they will make less dumb news consumer choices.
By dumb, Parker means increasingly partisan — not thoughtful and illuminating so much as argumentative, designed to appeal to prejudices we already have. PostScript thinks it’s a business model problem — a 24-hour cable news channel works best when it is not dependent on the actual news but rather a steady supply of people who will say things whether or not there is news. Also, studies have shown that viewers want to be right more than they want to be educated, especially if the education contradicts our current thinking. Again, the safer business model is pandering, which makes us dumber.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/parker-and-dumber-news/2012/07/18/gJQAqRW5tW_blog.html
You'll never get rich telling the truth. And if you get rich, you may rest assured that you are not telling that truth. You've instead jumped the tracks somewhere along the way, and you've somehow convinced yourself that accurately reporting upon the minutiae of narratives counts for a brave uncovering of the truth.
If your newspaper is in the black, it is because you are not telling the truth.
If you do not receive red-colored letters in the mail from the power company, the lights in your TV studio are not illuminating truth tellers.
If you have an esteemed, front row seat at White House press briefings, you are not telling the truth.
This world is awash in lies. It takes an entire lifetime to learn how to spot the truth. You want a good rule of thumb about how to identify those who are on to the truth? Are their lights on? Can they pay the bills? Have they got a well appointed boardroom in a shiny, new office building?
Satan pays his own way in this world. I mean to say that if someone or something were to wish to manipulate humanity, he would immediately insinuate himself into the medium of their economic exchange. He would immediately multiply his force by going into central banking. Again, if you control currency, you control activity. If you control activity, you control actors. Satan pays his way by issuing his own currency and rewarding those who either consciously assist him or those who acquiesce to his designs.
And if you're not with the program, guess what?
Satan may turn out to be something so mundane as simply the darker side of human nature, a force that we have chosen to personify by adding a face to it.
Probably not, though.
If people value money above all else, and if Satan were to immediately target the monetary system so that he may provide that money, then we guarantee the inexorable destruction of everything good in this world. Why do we have people shoving bananas up their own asses in torture chambers? The love of money.
Why do we not care that our loved ones spent their final moments scrabbling at the walls and screaming as they got cooked alive in a yawn-inducing urban renewal project? The love of money.
Truth doesn't sell. It's why I shit in a bucket. It's why decent newspapers go bankrupt.
I don't actually have to prove anything. I wouldn't ever have to provide a single footnote, or document a fact, or cite my sources. All I'd have to do to prove my credibility is to point at my shit bucket. "Satan pays his own way in this world and as you can see, I'm not down with the program. And that's fine by me."
If you value money above all else, you become actively complicit in the spread of darkness in this world.